A reader contributed, via
email, some thoughts about an international perspective on shortening the
workweek. He remarked that salaried French employees whom he had supervised had
work habits similar to their American peers, i.e., focusing on the task rather than
the hours spend on the job. His anecdotal assessment is that well-compensated salaried
employees, in general, produced as much after the implementation of the 35-hour
workweek as before enactment of the 35-hour legislation.
He made a second important
observation:
What did have an impact on how multinational corporations
parceled out white-collar jobs across different countries: the relative cost of
doing business in France, such as prices of commercial real estate in Paris;
and the near impossibility of layoffs in France should it become necessary. One
didn’t create a position in France unless one was very certain that either the
position would exist indefinitely or the corporation would go bankrupt and lay
off everyone.
In an increasingly global
economy in which multinational corporations seek competitive advantage in their
decisions about where to locate employees, legislation about the length of the
workweek, minimum wage, etc., will frequently effect labor markets in ways that
are difficult to quantify. For example, did the 35-hour week reduce, increase,
or have little effect on the number of hourly workers in France? Given the
amount of statistical noise in labor data, even tentative conclusions are
difficult.
What globalization does suggest
is that the world is in a transitional period, moving from national economies
to an international economy, i.e., the European transition begun with a single
currency toward a single, integrated economy is also occurring on a global
basis, albeit more slowly and with much greater complexity.
Transitions often create new
winners and losers. Transitions are also very difficult on people whose lives the
friction of changing dynamics destroy. I suspect that the anger and frustration
of the Occupy Wall Street movement and its sister protests elsewhere (one began
today in London) express some of that transitional pain. The pain is not a
reason to end the transition abruptly but a reminder that walking the Jesus path
requires special concern for the most vulnerable, a priority that includes
those squeezed by basic social transitions over which they have no control.
0 comments:
Post a Comment