In response to both cancer and terrorism, an individual has two basic
choices: fear or courage.
In the short run, fear advantageously heightens a person’s senses, thus
increasing vigilance along with the potential to improve the rapidity and
quality of one’s response. Over the longer term, including fights against
cancer and terrorism, fear’s disadvantages outweigh that advantage:
- Fear loses its power over time, the altered condition becoming the new normal.
- Life is inherently risky. No prophylactics exist to ensure that one will not develop cancer. Similarly, no guarantees exist to prevent one from becoming a victim in a terror attack. Indeed, counterterrorism authorities unanimously agree that there are too many potential targets to protect all of them.
- Fear inherently degrades one’s quality of life.
Conversely, courage tempered by prudence (avoiding that which is rash)
has only advantages:
- Courage is a moral habit that develops and strengthens with practice.
- Courageous living is essential for living abundantly.
President Trump’s policies and pronouncements about terrorism are a
call to live fearfully. I, for one, refuse to live in fear, whether fear of
terrorism or fear of cancer. I choose life. I choose to live courageously. What
is your choice?
1 comment:
Fr. George---Fear I believe is the prerequisite of courage—which can be overcome by rising above it---Further supported by various verses including Psalm 27:1---“The LORD is my light and my salvation—whom shall I fear? The LORD is the stronghold of my life—of whom shall I be afraid?”---Thanks
Post a Comment