Rethinking Ash Wednesday

-
In this post, I suggest a more modern interpretation of why Christians continue to impose ashes. (My 2016 Ethical Musings post Ash Wednesday sketched the traditional understandings of the annual Christian practice of imposing ashes.)
Christianity needs to rethink Ash Wednesday. Few twenty-first Christians in the developed world feel very guilty, especially compared to Christians during the Middle Ages. Furthermore, guilt is a poor motivator for changing behavior. Finally, increasing numbers of Christians reject not only the theological doctrine of original sin but also all of the several interpretations of Jesus’ crucifixion that emphasize his death as an essential requirement for God forgiving human sin. Hence, a majority of Christians have voted with their feet, absenting themselves from Ash Wednesday observances, tacitly believing the observances generally meaningless and irrelevant.
Rethinking Ash Wednesday begins by recognizing that the words used to impose ashes – Remember that you are dust, and to dust you shall return – has two widely ignored meanings vitally relevant to contemporary life.
First, being dust emphasizes that humans are physical beings. Our spiritual dimension has no independent existence. Instead, the human spirit consists of those physical attributes that are quintessentially and uniquely (only in degree) human.

Second, because humans are dust, humans are inherently integral elements of God’s glorious creation. Therefore, we should celebrate rather than bemoan or lament human life and the human condition. Consequently, adding glitter to the ashes imposed on Ash Wednesday is a very appropriate act (though I’ve not yet seen this interpretation of that act).

Comments

Anonymous said…
“Guilty” is not what I feel. Although I cannot be responsible for what was wrong in the world before I became old enough to do anything about it, at my present age I do feel intermittent responsibility for the manifold and profound injustices of the world. I do confess that often I ignore those injustices because I either benefit from them personally or am too lazy to confront them. Ash Wednesday serves us well if it reminds us of corporate guilt, the things left undone – or, as one confessional prayer put it, “the evil done on our behalf”. In my mind, failure to address these injustices replaces the historical concept of original sin.
Maybe there are additional moments of individual culpability (the “things done”) that ride on top of that… more for some people, less for others. If we have arrived at the point where few people commit direct, explicit sin in the classical sense, then great… but there is plenty of other bad stuff to address.
March 7, 2017 at 3:37 PM
George Clifford said…
Responsibility and guilt are different. Personal culpability is important when a person is directly responsible for causing evil. But much of the evil in the world – and, as you observe, there is lots of it – is not directly attributable to any person or small group.
March 7, 2017 at 3:38 PM
Jay Croft said…
I do have problems with the BCP service, especially Psalm 51. My mother was legally married when she conceived me!

Yet the Ash Wednesday service should not be abandoned. It serves a purpose, as does Good Friday. Not many people participate in either, but it's there, and is an essential part of the Church Year.

As for glitter on the ashes, I think it's silly, but then I'm an Old Curmudgeon.
March 9, 2017 at 7:10 AM
George Clifford said…
I am not proposing that we eliminate either Ash Wednesday or Good Friday from the liturgical cycle. What I am proposing is an alternative interpretation to make those days more meaningful for people who do not live with guilt at the center of their spiritual and theological lives.
March 9, 2017 at 2:41 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post-election blues

-
 This Veteran’s Day has prompted some musings about the color blue, the election and Veteran’s Day. First, former Vice President Biden is now President-elect Biden. The Democrats, generally depicted by the color blue in color graphics, won the presidential election. The chaos and lack of character widely associated with President Trump will soon vacate the White House. The US has now had both a Black president and a Black woman Vice President-elect. When I was born, both were unimaginable in the segregated Jim Crow south as well as, if we're honest, in the rest of the US. Second, President Trump probably feels depressed, an emotion associated with the color blue. His depression is obvious in his mien. He, from all appearances, is not a person who copes well with losing or rejection. Similarly, other candidates, Democrats and Republicans alike, who invested considerable time, emotion and resources in losing campaigns for office also probably feel depressed. Yet, I’m grateful f
Read more

Why won't Trump release his tax returns?

-
President Trump’s refusal to make his tax returns public is intriguing and troubling. The IRS routinely audits Presidential and Congressional tax returns. Yet former Presidents and most members of Congress have made their tax returns public. Possible explanations for Trump’s refusal include: His tax returns may reveal that he is not as wealthy as he would like for people to believe. Many real estate investments are heavily leveraged (i.e., mortgaged), so perhaps his substantial real estate holdings represent a relatively small net worth totaling in the hundreds of millions instead of billions. His tax returns may reveal that he derives a disproportionate share of his income from licensing his name instead of the successful real estate deals about which he boasts. His tax returns may reveal aggressive interpretations of the tax code that trigger repeated audits that are not always resolved in his favor. If Trump’s tax returns would enhance his public image by showing th
Read more

Mass murder in Orlando

-
The recent mass murder at a gay nightclub in Orlando has prompted four musings. First, the shooters in both the Orlando and the San Bernardino attacks apparently fully complied with Federal firearms laws when the attackers purchased the weapons used in those attacks. This is not an argument against background checks and other requirements. Instead, this observation points to the inadequacy of present laws to keep people safe. Second, the shooter in Orlando, like the shooters in San Bernardino, appears to have had no links to any terror group, domestic or foreign. As I have previously argued in Ethical Musings, considering all mass murder as terrorism unhelpfully conflates two different types of crime. Tightening immigration policies would not have prevented the Orlando attack. Third, the ultimate path to a safer society consists of promoting respect for the dignity and worth of all persons. Laws that encourage divisiveness (e.g., laws in North Carolina about who can use which pu
Read more