Lent and our need for reconciliation

-

A couple, married or otherwise, who split up when they have one or more children together is rarely simple. If both want a role in the child(ren)’s life, two persons now going their individual ways must find a means to co-parent and to communicate. Otherwise, even when divorce is obviously the best choice for all involved, the child(ren) will most likely enter adulthood with significantly greater challenges (if not handicaps) and deeper emotional scars.

For about a year and a half, I’ve volunteered as a mediator at the Mediation Center of the Pacific (MCP). Most of the cases that I mediate involve domestic situations: a parent wanting to establish or change timesharing arrangements (what used to be called visitation, but is more appropriately labelled timesharing since both parties are the child(ren)’s parents), custody of the children, division of marital assets/debts in case of a divorce, etc. Although mediation is not therapy, many pastoral counseling skills (e.g., active, empathic listening) apply directly to the mediation process.

Through successful mediation, persons adopt a modus vivendi, an arrangement by which the conflicting parties can peacefully co-exist. This modus vivendi can become a step toward a fuller experience of reconciliation. Illustratively, two persons unable to talk without fighting learn to talk about their child(ren) without fighting, then discover a way to communicate that verges on amicable. They slowly put old animosities aside, maybe forgive the hurt or part of it, with their relationship now shaped by shared goals and concerns for their progeny.

Reconciliation to God and to others is one of the great themes of Lent. That’s prompted some musings about a possible connection between reconciliation and mediation. The two are certainly not synonymous. Yet, Christians too frequently conceive of reconciliation as an event, not as a journey or a process over time. By way of contrast, Twelve Step programs describe reconciliation as an iterative process, with each move through the steps reconciling the person more fully to others and to the person’s higher power. In Jesus’ parable of the prodigal son, although the Father never held a grudge, the son for a long time was unwilling to amend his life, unable to perceive his father’s enduring love and therefore afraid to return home. The change within the son, born of desperation, required time to mature and to develop.

With whom do you need or wish to take a step toward reconciliation this Lent?

Comments

— said…
George, I love your writings and respect your opinion. But I have to ask the question: How am I to take the need for reconciliation seriously when, here in DioVA, +Goff has told me in writing that the church will not get involved in my former rector’s perjury unless he faces criminal charges?

I understand that all organizations tend to protect the organization when faced with a perceived threat, and that bishops often have little access to first0hand information. But having left the church over this issue, I am sincerely interested in your thoughts. And no, I’m not just posting to be a curmudgeon.
March 23, 2020 at 11:47 PM
George Clifford said…
I think you have taken a couple of steps toward reconciliation: first, in recognizing the alienation, a step that many conflict avoidant people and organizations gloss over; second, presumably, in having spoken with the rector regarding the problems; third, in having communicated with the diocese about the issue. As I note in the post, reconciliation is not always possible. When reconciliation is impossible, then a person can best move forward by identifying and letting go of what s/he has no power over and finding peace in her/his own spirit. Perhaps those moves are your best options?
March 24, 2020 at 6:44 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jesus, Lamb of God

-
The image of Jesus as the Lamb of God pervades Christianity. The lamb is a familiar symbol for Jesus, found not only in today's gospel[1] but also throughout the New Testament as well as in art and literature. The image of Jesus as the Lamb of God reinterprets the Jewish Passover narrative, which describes the angel of death in Egypt passing over Israelite houses marked with the blood of a lamb, killing only the Egyptian first born. Thus, we have the Agnus Dei, “O Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us,”[2] a part of Christian liturgies since the early fourth century.[3]

Biblical images and metaphors are often complex and confusing. For example, Biblical authors describe Christians as God's sheep, although they sometimes refer to Jews as sheep, even in the New Testament.[4] New Testament authors similarly describe Jesus as both the Lamb of God and the shepherd, two conflicting images actually found in a single verse in the Revelation of John.[5]…
Read more

Mass murder in Orlando

-
The recent mass murder at a gay nightclub in Orlando has prompted four musings. First, the shooters in both the Orlando and the San Bernardino attacks apparently fully complied with Federal firearms laws when the attackers purchased the weapons used in those attacks. This is not an argument against background checks and other requirements. Instead, this observation points to the inadequacy of present laws to keep people safe. Second, the shooter in Orlando, like the shooters in San Bernardino, appears to have had no links to any terror group, domestic or foreign. As I have previously argued in Ethical Musings, considering all mass murder as terrorism unhelpfully conflates two different types of crime. Tightening immigration policies would not have prevented the Orlando attack. Third, the ultimate path to a safer society consists of promoting respect for the dignity and worth of all persons. Laws that encourage divisiveness (e.g., laws in North Carolina about who can use which public …
Read more

Why won't Trump release his tax returns?

-
President Trump’s refusal to make his tax returns public is intriguing and troubling. The IRS routinely audits Presidential and Congressional tax returns. Yet former Presidents and most members of Congress have made their tax returns public. Possible explanations for Trump’s refusal include: His tax returns may reveal that he is not as wealthy as he would like for people to believe. Many real estate investments are heavily leveraged (i.e., mortgaged), so perhaps his substantial real estate holdings represent a relatively small net worth totaling in the hundreds of millions instead of billions.His tax returns may reveal that he derives a disproportionate share of his income from licensing his name instead of the successful real estate deals about which he boasts.His tax returns may reveal aggressive interpretations of the tax code that trigger repeated audits that are not always resolved in his favor.
If Trump’s tax returns would enhance his public image by showing that he possesses gr…
Read more