Musings about establishing a Leadership PAC

-



Recent news media articles report that President Trump’s leadership political action committee (PAC) has raised more than $170 million. The PAC reportedly raised the money following his defeat in his bid for a second term as President.

I’m thinking of establishing my own leadership PAC. Apparently, the only real limitation on how a leadership PAC can spend its money is a $5000 cap on a contribution to each political campaign. Money in a leadership PAC can legally fund an individual’s personal expenditures without limitation – at least if news media reports are correct.

You like me, don’t you? You think that I, like Donald Trump, deserve to live a luxurious lifestyle paid for by someone else, don’t you? Wouldn’t you contribute generously to my leadership PAC even if contributions aren’t deductible on your taxes? Generous support for my leadership PAC may also help me, like Trump, enjoy a lavish lifestyle while concurrently managing my personal finances in a way that allows me to legally avoid paying income taxes.

Unlike Trump, I’m not a narcissist. I’ll thank you for your generosity and not demand unquestioning loyalty. Unlike Trump, no entity that I’ve led has ever declared bankruptcy. Unlike Trump, I’ve not acquired a reputation as a liar. To frame those remarks in positive statements, I’m trustworthy. I’m a competent fiscal manager. And I’ll not seek revenge if after contributing to my PAC you subsequently decide you prefer not to give my PAC any additional gifts.

Furthermore, I don’t have hundreds of millions of dollars of debt coming due in the next few months (or ever!). I try to be nice to people and find no pleasure in making necessary decisions even if the decision may cause hurt (no gleeful “You’re fired!” from me). I trust good science as a basis for decision making. I try to gather a reasonable amount of data before making a decision (nobody ever has all of the facts). I like learning. I read a wide variety of materials. I prefer substance over show. I try to live a life defined by generosity, service and relationships instead of a life characterized by achievement, status and wealth.

Liking to think the best of people, I’m optimistic about my PAC’s success. Since people have donated $170 million to Trump’s leadership PAC, my leadership PAC, once established, I hope that my PAC might receive contributions of at least several million. I hope you agree my PAC would represent a good use of your money. Additionally, I promise to account fully and openly for all donations and expenses.

So, when I establish my leadership PAC, I’m counting on you to contribute generously.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why won't Trump release his tax returns?

-
President Trump’s refusal to make his tax returns public is intriguing and troubling. The IRS routinely audits Presidential and Congressional tax returns. Yet former Presidents and most members of Congress have made their tax returns public. Possible explanations for Trump’s refusal include: His tax returns may reveal that he is not as wealthy as he would like for people to believe. Many real estate investments are heavily leveraged (i.e., mortgaged), so perhaps his substantial real estate holdings represent a relatively small net worth totaling in the hundreds of millions instead of billions. His tax returns may reveal that he derives a disproportionate share of his income from licensing his name instead of the successful real estate deals about which he boasts. His tax returns may reveal aggressive interpretations of the tax code that trigger repeated audits that are not always resolved in his favor. If Trump’s tax returns would enhance his public image by showing th
Read more

Mass murder in Orlando

-
The recent mass murder at a gay nightclub in Orlando has prompted four musings. First, the shooters in both the Orlando and the San Bernardino attacks apparently fully complied with Federal firearms laws when the attackers purchased the weapons used in those attacks. This is not an argument against background checks and other requirements. Instead, this observation points to the inadequacy of present laws to keep people safe. Second, the shooter in Orlando, like the shooters in San Bernardino, appears to have had no links to any terror group, domestic or foreign. As I have previously argued in Ethical Musings, considering all mass murder as terrorism unhelpfully conflates two different types of crime. Tightening immigration policies would not have prevented the Orlando attack. Third, the ultimate path to a safer society consists of promoting respect for the dignity and worth of all persons. Laws that encourage divisiveness (e.g., laws in North Carolina about who can use which pu
Read more

Post-election blues

-
 This Veteran’s Day has prompted some musings about the color blue, the election and Veteran’s Day. First, former Vice President Biden is now President-elect Biden. The Democrats, generally depicted by the color blue in color graphics, won the presidential election. The chaos and lack of character widely associated with President Trump will soon vacate the White House. The US has now had both a Black president and a Black woman Vice President-elect. When I was born, both were unimaginable in the segregated Jim Crow south as well as, if we're honest, in the rest of the US. Second, President Trump probably feels depressed, an emotion associated with the color blue. His depression is obvious in his mien. He, from all appearances, is not a person who copes well with losing or rejection. Similarly, other candidates, Democrats and Republicans alike, who invested considerable time, emotion and resources in losing campaigns for office also probably feel depressed. Yet, I’m grateful f
Read more