Should we support Sunnis or Shiites?

-
An Ethical Musings' reader inquired: Who are we supposed to support, Sunni or Shiite Muslims?

I'm unclear about the antecedent of the pronoun "we" in the foregoing question. The "we" may be Christians or it may be the United States. Regardless, my answer is quite simply; Support both Sunni and Shiite Muslims.

First, both Sunnis and Shiites are God's children. The issues that divide Islam's two largest communities are irrelevant to non-Muslims. Controversial issues include whether leadership of the Muslim faith community requires a blood tie to the prophet Mohammed (Sunnis say no, Shiites answer yes), whether Muslims have saints and shrines (Sunnis say no, Shiites say yes), and so forth.

Second, Islam in both its Shiite and Sunni traditions is a religion of peace. Islamic extremism has arisen among both Shiites (e.g., Hezbollah) and Sunnis (e.g., al Qaeda). These extremists groups attempt to mobilize Muslims against what they perceive as egregious injustice. Clothing the protest in religious language and ideology adds an emotive power to the protest while concurrently placing the opposition between a proverbial rock and hard place. On the one hand, failing to oppose the protesters actively tacitly cedes their complaints credence and jeopardizes the status quo. On the other hand, actively opposing the protest can easily create the impression that the current regime is non-Islamic and opposed to Allah's call for justice. People and states everywhere should expose injustice for the evil that it is and support progress toward justice and peace. This entails supporting Sunni and Shiite while rejecting extremist groups that adopt a twisted form of either.


Third, Shiite Iran is challenging Sunni Saudi Arabia for hegemony in the Middle East. Since the Shah of Iran's downfall, this centuries old challenge has become a principal source of conflict in the Middle East. The United States, branded by Iran as the Great Satan, has sided with Saudi Arabia, primarily because of oil interests and Saudi willingness to support U.S. foreign policy goals. Saudi trust in the U.S. is eroding. The U.S. government is increasingly open about the potential weakness of Saudi power and Saudi responsibility for having sewn many of the seeds that grew into Sunni extremism. Iran appears to want to reenter the global community. Perhaps this is the moment for U.S. policy to pivot, balancing support for Shiite Iran and Sunni Saudi Arabia. (N.B.: In both Iran and Saudi Arabia, Islam is the officially established religion. However, neither nation's government perfectly embodies Islamic teachings. Indeed, describing either as Islamic is demographic rather than theological; both nation's aim to promote the well-being of their governing elites rather than the fullness of Islamic justice. Of course, a similar assessment holds for allegedly Christian nations, e.g., the now defunct Holy Roman Empire.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mass murder in Orlando

-
The recent mass murder at a gay nightclub in Orlando has prompted four musings. First, the shooters in both the Orlando and the San Bernardino attacks apparently fully complied with Federal firearms laws when the attackers purchased the weapons used in those attacks. This is not an argument against background checks and other requirements. Instead, this observation points to the inadequacy of present laws to keep people safe. Second, the shooter in Orlando, like the shooters in San Bernardino, appears to have had no links to any terror group, domestic or foreign. As I have previously argued in Ethical Musings, considering all mass murder as terrorism unhelpfully conflates two different types of crime. Tightening immigration policies would not have prevented the Orlando attack. Third, the ultimate path to a safer society consists of promoting respect for the dignity and worth of all persons. Laws that encourage divisiveness (e.g., laws in North Carolina about who can use which pu
Read more

Why won't Trump release his tax returns?

-
President Trump’s refusal to make his tax returns public is intriguing and troubling. The IRS routinely audits Presidential and Congressional tax returns. Yet former Presidents and most members of Congress have made their tax returns public. Possible explanations for Trump’s refusal include: His tax returns may reveal that he is not as wealthy as he would like for people to believe. Many real estate investments are heavily leveraged (i.e., mortgaged), so perhaps his substantial real estate holdings represent a relatively small net worth totaling in the hundreds of millions instead of billions. His tax returns may reveal that he derives a disproportionate share of his income from licensing his name instead of the successful real estate deals about which he boasts. His tax returns may reveal aggressive interpretations of the tax code that trigger repeated audits that are not always resolved in his favor. If Trump’s tax returns would enhance his public image by showing th
Read more

Jesus, Lamb of God

-
The image of Jesus as the Lamb of God pervades Christianity. The lamb is a familiar symbol for Jesus, found not only in today's gospel [1] but also throughout the New Testament as well as in art and literature. The image of Jesus as the Lamb of God reinterprets the Jewish Passover narrative, which describes the angel of death in Egypt passing over Israelite houses marked with the blood of a lamb, killing only the Egyptian first born. Thus, we have the Agnus Dei , “O Lamb of God, that takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us,” [2] a part of Christian liturgies since the early fourth century. [3] Biblical images and metaphors are often complex and confusing. For example, Biblical authors describe Christians as God's sheep, although they sometimes refer to Jews as sheep, even in the New Testament. [4] New Testament authors similarly describe Jesus as both the Lamb of God and the shepherd, two conflicting images actually found in a single verse in the Revel
Read more